Harperites Seek to Silence the Churches Sunday, Jun 24 2012 

Senator Nicole Eaton now joins the ranks of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Environment Minister Peter Kent and Energy Minister Joe Oliver in trashing any group or organization that raises a dissenting voice to governmental policies or actions. Only Senator Eaton has now given the issue a new twist, helping the cause of government propaganda she has decided to target the mainline churches in Canada.

Over the last few months we have heard ministers of the crown speaking about, “money laundering” and “radicals serving foreign interests”. Added to that venting of spleen is Senator Eaton’s offering of, “influence peddling”. The Prime Minister in a recent interview with Peter Mansbridge even offered the view that organizations who receive federal funding and publicly dissent from government policy will have their funding reviewed because such dissent is not appropriate. The only common thread in this villification and focused attack is that these groups have the audacity to question the priorities and actions of the government. What a sin!

But now the real fun begins for the government. They will try to silence the environmental groups who stand in the way of their pro petroleum legislation and policies. Then they will move on to attack the churches who should not, as the good senator opines, “take political stands. They should be more about helping people and giving people succour”. I am sure next on the list will be the poverty groups, immigration and refugee support agencies and of course those organizations that support women’s issues. The only thing lacking is legislation to ban such groups from actually existing. Fear not, given another mandate, that legislation will enevitably follow.

So what do we make of this attack on the churches? Although only the United Church was singled out for this particular example of vituperation, you can be assured that the Anglican Church, the Roman Catholic Church and others have often committed the “sin” of critiquing the policies of various governments. I recall in the 1970’s the document “Ethical Reflections on the Economic Crisis” published by the CCCB of the Roman Catholic Church received a dismissive comment from Prime Minister Trudeau who said that the bishops should stick to theology and leave economics to the government. Author’s note: (After all the politicians have always done so well by the economy.”) The Anglican Church has often sent clear messages of concern about policies of various levels of government. They have also publicly condemned the federal government for certain policies and initiatives through resolutions passed at General Synod.

My reading of this is similar to Moderator Mardi Tindal who publicly stated, ” there is a very clear distinction between being political, meaning advocating for changes in public policy, and being partisan.” In fact over the last fifty years the churches have felt both the need and the responsibility to keep governments accountable and they have done this on a totally non-partisan basis. I have seen churches criticize Liberal, Conservative and New Democratic  governments across Canada. The point is not that they represent a particular political stripe but that they are the government and therefore responsible to the citizens for the policies and actions that they espouse.

A number of people have taken up the view that there should be a separation between church and state. Maybe this is necessary, it is certainly a debatable point. I hasten to add that the particular doctrine of the separation of church and state is enshrined in the United States system of government, not in the Canadian or British tradition.

What I find offensive is the act of Ministers of the Crown questioning any group or organization’s right to crticize or express dissent. They do so on what basis? To defend the Income Tax Act? To ward off revolution or the attempt to be criminally engaged or perpetrate violence? No, they are engaged in a cynical and reprehensible campaign to further their ideologically based policies by destroying any person or group who has the courage, intelligence and comittment to express a vision of Canada which is just, equitable and compassionate, in other words the opposite agenda to the present government’s.

Mercifully Christians in Canada follow the gospel of Jesus Christ not the gospel of Stephen Harper. I don’t speak for any church, Anglican or otherwise, but I can enunciate clearly what many Christians feel when the government starts name-calling, accusing, and using innuendo to besmirch the good names of people and groups who are unwilling to follow the dictates of this authoritarian regime. They are offended and find such behaviour extremely repugnant.

If the government truly believed in democracy, and the last few months have decidedly shown otherwise, they would not only allow discontent and dissent but ensure that other views are afforded opportunity to be expressed. Democracy requires all sides to be heard for for the initiation of good public policy and so that the best legislative decisions are able to be made. After all, who really has the upper hand in this struggle;  the government or a host of ill funded non profit agencies and organizations that depend on volunteers and the good will of their supporters? If anything is clear from these governmental attacks, it is that the government is afraid of its own citizens and intends to crush any expression of dissent.

If the Harperites continue to initiate the same unjust and inhumane policies that we have seen of late we will not only oppose them, we will redouble our efforts and ensure that every mis-step, every attack, every policy and regulation that hurts our citizens and that sells out the rights of Canadians is witnessed to and that they, the government, are made accountable. They believe that power resides in the government. This is wrong and dangerous thinking in a democracy. The government only has as much power as the citizens of Canada are willing to allow them to use. 

My friends remember, time is on our side,  not theirs.

Advice to David Wilks MP: You’re too nice a guy to swim with sharks. Thursday, May 24 2012 

I have to say after seeing the videos of David Wilks speaking with his constituents I actually felt sorry for the guy. There he is, a decent man, who is trying to swim through the muck of Parliament Hill and do the right thing. The problem is he is too honest. You can see in his discussion with his constituents that he has lots of concerns about Bill C-38 and the process, or lack there of, which has put him in the position of defending the indefensible.

He freely acknowledges that one member can do nothing against the Prime Ministers Office and cabinet decisions. He also mentions that the caucus didn’t even see the bill before its being placed on the Order Paper. Tonda McCharles included the following quotes in her Toronto Star articele posted today May 23rd 2012.

‘He explains, however, that his vote like that of the entire Conservative caucus is subject to a “three-line whip.” That means, says Wilks, a retired RCMP officer, that he would likely be evicted from caucus for dissenting from the budget decisions already made by the prime minister and cabinet.’

‘He adds Conservative MP’s during their first year of majority government have not been allowed one free vote. “I haven’t seen one in a year yet.”’

“It’s been done like that since 1867,” Wilks says.

‘Another woman challenges Wilks to speak up: “At what point do you say I will not vote along party lines and I will represent my constituents?”’

‘“You want me as an Independent member, I will do that,” replied Wilks.’

‘In the first excerpt posted on YouTube, a participant suggests to Wilks that he must be able to influence the process before it gets to a vote. “Surely there’s some kind of debate behind the scenes before you get to that point?”’

‘“No,” replies Wilks.’

‘Another constituent asks Wilks: “Does that not grate that you don’t have internal debates?” And Wilks acknowledges his “concerns.”’

‘“It certainly concerns some of us backbenchers, the decisions are made predominantly by cabinet and then they come back to us informing us how this is going to move forward.”’

Now none of this is really new. PMO’s and cabinets have long held the view that Members of Parliament are merely cannon fodder in the political wars between competing political interests. Where there is a demarcation between Stephen Harper and prime ministers before him is found in two elements that are native only to him. The first element has been in evidence since the earliest days of Stephen Harper’s public life when he portrayed himself as the protector of parliament and an advocate for the freeing up of democracy. He was all in favour of referenda, an elected Senate, free votes in the House of Commons and other pro democracy measures. Where are they now. Where are the free votes in parliament or the referring of issues to be decided by the citizens of Canada through referenda?

The other element which differentiates him from other prime ministers is his absolute commitment to secrecy. In the past he attacked successive governments for lack of transperancy and lack of consultation and now, in the position of Prime Minister in a majority government, he has not only adopted the ways of former occupants of that office but he has become even less inclined to take the people of Canada into his confidence. Secrecy is not only his byword it is in fact his preferred style of leadership. Simply put secrecy is the means that he uses to hide his need to control.

The denoument of this vignette concerning poor Mr Wilks MP for Kootenay-Columbia happened today when his office issued the unsurprising clarification that follows.

“I wish to clarify my position with regard to Bill C-38, the Jobs, Growth and Long-Term Prosperity Act. I support this bill, and the jobs and growth measures that it will bring for Canadians in Kootenay-Columbia and right across the country.

In our region alone, our Government’s Economic Action Plan 2012 will support jobs and growth by ensuring we can develop our natural resources in a responsible way that creates well-paying jobs while protecting our environment. Our Plan will also deliver investments in training, infrastructure and opportunities for youth, First Nations, newcomers and unemployed Canadians.

These important measures will help British Columbia and Canada remain strong and prosperous. I look forward to supporting the bill and seeing it passed.”

Reading this statement and looking at the video of Mr Wilks with his constituents makes me feel very sad for Mr Wilks and for the people of his constituency. But I feel shame that we have a government that respects no one. The Harper government shows no respect for seniors, the unemployed, immigrants, refugees indigenous people and now we can add the backbench Members of the Conservative Party. The list seems to be growing longer everyday.